Sunday, 3 March 2013

More allegations Driver doesn't have the balls to publish

I see that Driver once again publishes more bullshit that he purports is true, doesn't reveal the people involved, where the report comes from, or any supporting evidence.

If only driver was prepared to try to prove his allegations, their veracity could be tested, but as we know, he simply throws mud, hopes some will stick to someone, so he can have a couple of column inches all to himself.

Have the courage of your convictions Driver, name the names you claim to have, and the source of the alleged report.

On a separate note, I have had a report passed to me that apparently some have suggested that a silly fat wanker is on the loose in Thanet, along with a deluded OAP who hangs on his every word as if passed down by a passing deity, no matter how ridiculous his/her rantings, trying to make his/her self the major talking point in the region ahead of some elections that may take place in the near future, in an effort to raise their profile.

Apparently I'm told, lies and made up non stories are created to position themselves in a favourable light, in spite of their shallow self promotion being clear and obvious to all. Apparently the silly fat wanker has a blog site that is nothing but perverse and highly questionable pseudo pornography, and I am led to believe he is a highly unsavoury character. Of course I have NO idea whether these allegations are true, no any way to asses their accuracy, but I do know many in Thanet who have encountered this person, who confirm to me that the above report is in their opinion entirely accurate.

2 comments:

  1. Well I believe them, John, particularly the fat wanker bit. As for the 'secret' document, obviously he is not bright enough to know that what, at best if genuine, amounts to a minute of a minute cannot possible be secret, a classification reserved for items of national security, though may be confidential to its addressees. One wonders how he got it and why he has had to type it all out rather than producing a scanned copy. Maybe it includes a few changes, no even he wouldn't do that, would he!

    ReplyDelete
  2. As you will see from my conversation with Michael Child, this document has been in circulation for some time

    ReplyDelete